T+00:00 Disruption declared

Recover inside the window.

Project Right Consulting helps organizations find what actually breaks, set recovery objectives they can meet, and exercise their plans until they work, including the processes that now run on AI. Led by Hiram Seraphin, CBCP, PMP.

Impact over timeBIA view
Impact curve showing recovery time objective at 24 hours, before the maximum tolerable period of disruption at 48 hours IMPACT TOLERANCE RTO T+24h MTPD T+48h T+0 24h 48h 72h IMPACT
━ Exercised plan┅ Documented only
8 yrs

In business continuity and operational resilience, after an earlier career in operations management

4 ISO

Standards certified in: 22301 continuity, 27001 security, 31000 risk and 42001 AI

8,000

Employee audience for the continuity training and disaster preparedness content I authored

6

Sectors: financial services, Big 4 advisory, supply chain, utilities, higher education, public sector

CBCP · DRIPMP · PMIISO 22301 CBCMISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer & Lead AuditorISO 27001 Lead ImplementerNIST CSF Lead ImplementerISO 31000 Risk AnalystMBA · BSc Mech. Eng.
T+01:00 Services

What we build with you

Practical continuity work, sized for organizations that need a program that holds up in a real event and stands up in an audit. Each engagement ends with artifacts your team owns and can run without us.

01 · Understand

Business impact analysis

BIA design and facilitation that tests the numbers instead of collecting them. We challenge recovery objectives against what the business can actually tolerate and what IT can actually deliver.

  • BIA questionnaire & workbook
  • RTO / RPO / MTPD challenge sessions
  • Residual-risk scoring
02 · Design

Continuity & COOP plans

Recovery strategies and plans written for the people who will run them at 3 a.m. New builds, refreshes of plans that have drifted from how the operation works today, and subject-matter review of public-sector Continuity of Operations (COOP) plans.

  • Recovery strategy selection
  • Plan development & refresh
  • COOP plan SME review
03 · Exercise

Tabletop exercises

Scenario-driven exercises with objectives set in advance, an observer whose only job is to watch, and findings captured while they are still accurate. Then the corrective actions get tracked to closure.

  • Exercise plan, scenario & injects
  • Facilitation & observer guides
  • After-action report & actions
04 · Map

Dependency & third-party resilience

Most dependency maps stop at the vendor you pay. We follow the chain past it, to the data center, the platform and the shared provider underneath, where concentration risk tends to hide.

  • Nth-party dependency tracing
  • Single points of failure
  • Vendor continuity review
05 · Govern

Program governance & metrics

Policy, standards and the operating rhythm behind them, aligned to ISO 22301. Dashboards that show leadership RTO/RPO attainment and testing status, and evidence that keeps the program audit-ready.

  • BCM policy & standards
  • KPI dashboards & heat maps
  • Findings & corrective action tracking
06 · Emerging

Continuity for AI-dependent work

When an AI service or agent sits inside a critical process, it is a dependency like any other. We find where AI is already in the workflow, define the fallback if it goes down or gets switched off, and connect that work to ISO/IEC 42001 controls.

  • AI dependency inventory
  • Fallback & shut-off procedures
  • AI scenarios for exercises

Also available: project and program delivery for resilience initiatives, run by a PMP in Microsoft Project or Monday.com, from charter and RACI through closeout and lessons learned.

T+04:00 AI workbench

AI that knows who makes the call

Over the past year I have used AI to build working continuity toolkits and small automations. Every one of them is designed the way a continuity plan is: a named decision owner, a deadline, and a safe default if the human goes quiet.

Pattern · human decision point with default fallback
AI proposes options, a human decides before a deadline, and if no decision arrives a safe default runs AI PROPOSES 8 options HUMAN DECIDES? YES HUMAN CHOICE runs SILENT BY DEADLINE SAFE DEFAULT runs THE PROCESS NEVER STALLS ON A MISSING DECISION
AI governance · through a continuity lens

Four questions I bring to any AI system in a critical process

ISO/IEC 42001 sets out how an organization governs AI. Continuity asks what happens when that AI fails, changes or has to be switched off. These are the questions where the two meet.

01

Inventory & criticality

Which AI systems sit inside critical processes, including the ones nobody approved? Then the BIA question: what is the impact if this one stops?

42001 ▸ AI system inventory & impact assessment
02

Supplier change

A model changes when the vendor changes it. Updates, deprecations and outages get treated as third-party events, with notice, testing and an exit path.

42001 ▸ Third-party & supplier relationships
03

Shut-off & fallback

Can the process keep running if the agent is switched off today? A fallback only counts once it has been exercised like any other recovery step.

42001 ▸ Operation & AI system life cycle
04

Decision rights

Who can pause the system, how quickly they hear about a problem, and what runs if they do not answer. Human oversight needs a name and a deadline.

42001 ▸ Roles, responsibilities & human oversight

Perspective and approach, informed by ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer and Lead Auditor certification.

Toolkit · BIA

ISO 22301 BIA program

A six-tab BIA workbook with a residual-risk scoring engine and summary dashboard, a 17-slide kickoff deck, and a facilitation manual, so every BIA follows the same structure.

BUILT WITH ▸ Claude
Toolkit · Exercises

Tabletop exercise package

A complete package generated from modular build scripts: exercise plan, master scenario events list, injects, facilitator guide, participant handouts and after-action templates.

BUILT WITH ▸ Claude, build scripts
Automation · Editorial

The editorial scout

A scheduled workflow that proposes eight researched topics every week for the Field Notes series. I make the call; if I don't by the deadline, a default goes ahead.

BUILT WITH ▸ Anthropic API, Google Apps Script
Pipeline · On-device

Private study pipeline

Ten live course sessions captured, transcribed locally and formatted into a 162-page reference. The audio never left the laptop: match the tool to the sensitivity of the data.

BUILT WITH ▸ Audacity, Whisper (local), Pandoc
Automation · Payroll

Fail-safe payroll workflow

Scheduled check-ins, a hard cutoff, provisional entries when an input is missing, and override by exception, so pay still goes out when something upstream fails. Read and write access kept separate.

BUILT WITH ▸ Google Apps Script, Drive (read-only)
Quality · Verification

Catching what AI gets wrong

An AI-drafted after-action readout looked finished, but carried a placeholder company name on five slides and downtime stated as 14, 47 and 72 hours. Reconciled, rebuilt, and turned into a seven-check review before anything is distributed.

PRACTICE ▸ Human review before release
AI tools in useMatched to the task and the sensitivity of the data

Build & analysis

ClaudeBIA toolkit, exercise packages
Claude CoworkTabletop build scripts
ChatGPTBIAs, checklists, research
GeminiExercise recovery scenarios

Automation & workflow

Anthropic APIScheduled AI workflows
Google Apps ScriptAutomation layer
MCP connectorsGoogle Drive, read-only
Microsoft CopilotEmail, workflow, reporting

Research & sources

PerplexityResearch with citations
NotebookLMCourse study sets

Transcription & media

Otter.aiMeeting transcription
Whisper (local)On-device transcription
HeyGen · Canva AIVideo and visuals
Audacity · OBS · PandocCapture and formatting
AI output is a draft,
not a finding.

AI does the heavy lifting on synthesis, drafting and cross-referencing. Recovery objectives, remediation priorities and anything that reaches executives stay with a person who can defend them. Certified ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer and Lead Auditor.

T+12:00 Approach

A program that improves every cycle

Documentation is where most programs stop. Ours is built to be run, measured and corrected, so the next real event goes better than the last exercise.

PHASE 1

Understand

Interview the business, map processes and dependencies, and set impact tolerances leaders will sign.

OUT ▸ Validated BIA, dependency map
PHASE 2

Design

Choose recovery strategies that match the objectives, then write plans the responders can actually follow.

OUT ▸ Strategies, plans, escalation paths
PHASE 3

Exercise

Run tabletops against realistic scenarios, including the step that fails, and measure against the targets.

OUT ▸ Exercise package, AAR
PHASE 4

Improve

Turn findings into owned, dated corrective actions and report progress to leadership until they close.

OUT ▸ Action register, dashboard
Findings from phase 4 feed the next BIA cycle. Reacting does not compound. Testing does.
T+24:00 Field notes

How things actually break

A weekly series on LinkedIn, anchored to real incidents and sourced data. Every post separates verified fact from opinion and puts its sources in plain view.

Exercises
Survived is not tested.

99% of the surveyed companies had a disruption last year. 51% have never tested their plan. Same 500 companies. Living through an event feels like evidence, and that is the most expensive thing to mistake it for.

Real disruptionExercise
ObjectivesSet by the eventSet in advance
ObservationAfter the factA dedicated observer
Success"It ended"Measured against a target
FindingsFrom memory, laterCaptured while accurate
Survey of 500 US small and mid-sized businesses in shipping and sourcing, April 2026, as reported by Digital Commerce 360.
Dependencies
Four layers away.

A hosting outage took my business email down. Tracing why led four layers past the provider I actually pay. Most dependency maps stop at layer one.

Dependency chain: your service depends on a provider, which depends on a data center, which depends on shared infrastructure; most maps stop at the first link YOURSERVICE L1PROVIDER L2–L3DATA CENTER L4UPSTREAM TYPICAL MAP ENDS WHERE IT FAILED
Illustrative. Based on an outage the author experienced firsthand.
Recovery
1.80 seconds. Or two days.

The fastest Formula 1 pit stop on record took 1.80 seconds. At Monaco in 2021, a wheel nut failed during a routine change and the wheel came off two days later at the factory. Plan for the wheel that won't come off, and decide in advance who calls it.

Guinness World Records; Crash.net reporting on Monaco 2021.
Adaptation
"Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth."Mike Tyson

A plan is a starting position. What has to hold when the punch lands is who decides, how fast they hear about it, and what they are allowed to change.

From the series post "Plans Don't Freeze."
BIA
The BIA resilience gap.

Programs often score close to 100% complete on documentation and far lower on what actually recovers. The plans are on file and the audits pass. Then a real scenario runs and the recovery time slips.

Author's analysis from eight years of program work.
AI risk
Never imagined it.

The 9/11 Commission named a failure of imagination. As AI moves into critical processes, the same failure is available again: scenarios nobody wrote because nobody pictured them.

From the series post "Never Imagined It."
AI dependency
When the model goes dark.

AI services have outages like any other provider. The question for continuity teams is which processes now stop when one does, and whether anyone wrote that down.

From the series post on AI service disruption.
Tabletop
What would you do?

A scenario post where readers make the calls, inject by inject. It is the fastest way to find out whether a team agrees on who decides before the event forces the question.

From the series' tabletop scenario post.

New post every Wednesday · 8:30 a.m. ET

Follow the series on LinkedIn
T+48:00 About

Hiram Seraphin, CBCP, PMP

I founded Project Right Consulting in 2018 to bring project discipline to the work of keeping organizations running. I trained as a mechanical engineer, which is where the habit started: find the load path, find the weak member, test it before it matters.

I have spent about eight years in business continuity and operational resilience. That work has included leading full-lifecycle continuity planning for mission-critical business units at a global financial market operator, supporting an executive-level pandemic response, serving on call for major incidents, and helping operationalize an enterprise continuity program for a Big 4 firm. Through Project Right, I served as the subject-matter expert reviewing Continuity of Operations (COOP) plans and drafted a new business continuity plan for a government agency. Before that came five years in operations management, leading a small team.

I mentor project managers through the PMI Atlanta Chapter and write a weekly series on how things actually break. I work from Atlanta with clients anywhere.

Financial services Advisory Supply chain Utilities Higher education Public sector · COOP
Hiram Seraphin, principal consultant at Project Right Consulting
Hiram SeraphinPrincipal Consultant
FirmProject Right Consulting LLC, est. 2018
BasedAtlanta, Georgia · remote nationwide
ContinuityCBCP (DRI) · ISO 22301 CBCM
DeliveryPMP (PMI) · Scrum Fundamentals
Security & riskISO 27001 LI · NIST CSF LI · ISO 31000 Risk Analyst
AIISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer & Lead Auditor
EducationMBA, Georgia State University · BSc Mechanical Engineering, University of the West Indies
BC toolingServiceNow BCM · Fusion · Archer · Everbridge
PM toolingMicrosoft Project · Monday.com
CommunityMentor, PMI Atlanta Chapter, since 2018
T+72:00 Next step

Find the weak link before the event does

Start with a 30-minute conversation about your program: where it stands, what an exercise would expose, and what to fix first. Hiring teams are welcome too; a résumé is available on request.

LocationAtlanta, GA · Eastern Time